Article 36: Changes to Notifications
Article 36
Changes to Notifications
Updated on 31 July 2024 based on the version published in the Official Journal of the EU dated 12 July 2024 and entered into force on 1 August 2024.
1. The notifying authority shall notify the Commission and the other Member States of any relevant changes to the notification of a notified body via the electronic notification tool referred to in Article 30(2).
2. The procedures laid down in Articles 29 and 30 shall apply to extensions of the scope of the notification.
For changes to the notification other than extensions of its scope, the procedures laid down in paragraphs (3) to (9) shall apply.
3. Where a notified body decides to cease its conformity assessment activities, it shall inform the notifying authority and the providers concerned as soon as possible and, in the case of a planned cessation, at least one year before ceasing its activities. The certificates of the notified body may remain valid for a period of nine months after cessation of the notified body’s activities, on condition that another notified body has confirmed in writing that it will assume responsibilities for the high-risk AI systems covered by those certificates. The latter notified body shall complete a full assessment of the high-risk AI systems affected by the end of that nine-month-period before issuing new certificates for those systems. Where the notified body has ceased its activity, the notifying authority shall withdraw the designation.
4. Where a notifying authority has sufficient reason to consider that a notified body no longer meets the requirements laid down in Article 31, or that it is failing to fulfil its obligations, the notifying authority shall without delay investigate the matter with the utmost diligence. In that context, it shall inform the notified body concerned about the objections raised and give it the possibility to make its views known. If the notifying authority comes to the conclusion that the notified body no longer meets the requirements laid down in Article 31 or that it is failing to fulfil its obligations, it shall restrict, suspend or withdraw the designation as appropriate, depending on the seriousness of the failure to meet those requirements or fulfil those obligations. It shall immediately inform the Commission and the other Member States accordingly.
5. Where its designation has been suspended, restricted, or fully or partially withdrawn, the notified body shall inform the providers concerned within 10 days.
6. In the event of the restriction, suspension or withdrawal of a designation, the notifying authority shall take appropriate steps to ensure that the files of the notified body concerned are kept, and to make them available to notifying authorities in other Member States and to market surveillance authorities at their request.
7. In the event of the restriction, suspension or withdrawal of a designation, the notifying authority shall:
- assess the impact on the certificates issued by the notified body;
- submit a report on its findings to the Commission and the other Member States within three months of having notified the changes to the designation;
- require the notified body to suspend or withdraw, within a reasonable period of time determined by the authority, any certificates which were unduly issued, in order to ensure the continuing conformity of high-risk AI systems on the market;
- inform the Commission and the Member States about certificates the suspension or withdrawal of which it has required;
- provide the national competent authorities of the Member State in which the provider has its registered place of business with all relevant information about the certificates of which it has required the suspension or withdrawal; that authority shall take the appropriate measures, where necessary, to avoid a potential risk to health, safety or fundamental rights.
8. With the exception of certificates unduly issued, and where a designation has been suspended or restricted, the certificates shall remain valid in one of the following circumstances:
- the notifying authority has confirmed, within one month of the suspension or restriction, that there is no risk to health, safety or fundamental rights in relation to certificates affected by the suspension or restriction, and the notifying authority has outlined a timeline for actions to remedy the suspension or restriction; or
- the notifying authority has confirmed that no certificates relevant to the suspension will be issued, amended or re-issued during the course of the suspension or restriction, and states whether the notified body has the capability of continuing to monitor and remain responsible for existing certificates issued for the period of the suspension or restriction; in the event that the notifying authority determines that the notified body does not have the capability to support existing certificates issued, the provider of the system covered by the certificate shall confirm in writing to the national competent authorities of the Member State in which it has its registered place of business, within three months of the suspension or restriction, that another qualified notified body is temporarily assuming the functions of the notified body to monitor and remain responsible for the certificates during the period of suspension or restriction.
9. With the exception of certificates unduly issued, and where a designation has been withdrawn, the certificates shall remain valid for a period of nine months under the following circumstances:
- the national competent authority of the Member State in which the provider of the high-risk AI system covered by the certificate has its registered place of business has confirmed that there is no risk to health, safety or fundamental rights associated with the high-risk AI systems concerned; and
- another notified body has confirmed in writing that it will assume immediate responsibility for those AI systems and completes its assessment within 12 months of the withdrawal of the designation.
In the circumstances referred to in the first subparagraph, the national competent authority of the Member State in which the provider of the system covered by the certificate has its place of business may extend the provisional validity of the certificates for additional periods of three months, which shall not exceed 12 months in total.
The national competent authority or the notified body assuming the functions of the notified body affected by the change of designation shall immediately inform the Commission, the other Member States and the other notified bodies thereof.
Table of Contents
Chapter III: High-Risk AI Systems
- Section 1: Classification of AI Systems as High-Risk
- Section 2: Requirements for High-Risk AI Systems
- Article 8: Compliance with the Requirements
- Article 9: Risk Management System
- Article 10: Data and Data Governance
- Article 11: Technical Documentation
- Article 12: Record-Keeping
- Article 13: Transparency and Provision of Information to Deployers
- Article 14: Human Oversight
- Article 15: Accuracy, Robustness and Cybersecurity
- Section 3: Obligations of Providers and Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems and Other Parties
- Article 16: Obligations of Providers of High-Risk AI Systems
- Article 17: Quality Management System
- Article 18: Documentation Keeping
- Article 19: Automatically Generated Logs
- Article 20: Corrective Actions and Duty of Information
- Article 21: Cooperation with Competent Authorities
- Article 22: Authorised Representatives of Providers of High-Risk AI Systems
- Article 23: Obligations of Importers
- Article 23a
- Article 24: Obligations of Distributors
- Article 25: Responsibilities along the AI Value Chain
- Article 26: Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems
- Article 27: Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment for High-Risk AI Systems
- Section 4: Notifying Authorities and Notified Bodies
- Article 28: Notifying Authorities
- Article 29: Application of a Conformity Assessment Body for Notification
- Article 30: Notification Procedure
- Article 31: Requirements Relating to Notified Bodies
- Article 32: Presumption of Conformity with Requirements Relating to Notified Bodies
- Article 33: Subsidiaries of Notified Bodies and Subcontracting
- Article 34: Operational Obligations of Notified Bodies
- Article 35: Identification Numbers and Lists of Notified Bodies
- Article 36: Changes to Notifications
- Article 37: Challenge to the Competence of Notified Bodies
- Article 38: Coordination of Notified Bodies
- Article 39: Conformity Assessment Bodies of Third Countries
- Section 5: Standards, Conformity Assessment, Certification, Registration
- Article 40: Harmonised Standards and Standardisation Deliverables
- Article 41: Common Specifications
- Article 42: Presumption of Conformity with Certain Requirements
- Article 43: Conformity Assessment
- Article 44: Certificates
- Article 45: Information Obligations of Notified Bodies
- Article 46: Derogation from Conformity Assessment Procedure
- Article 47: EU Declaration of Conformity
- Article 48: CE Marking
- Article 49: Registration
Chapter V: General-Purpose AI Models
Chapter VI: Measures in Support of Innovation
- Article 57: AI Regulatory Sandboxes
- Article 58: Detailed Arrangements for, and Functioning of, AI Regulatory Sandboxes
- Article 59: Further Processing of Personal Data for Developing Certain AI Systems in the Public Interest in the AI Regulatory Sandbox
- Article 60: Testing of High-Risk AI Systems in Real World Conditions Outside AI Regulatory Sandboxes
- Article 61: Informed Consent to Participate in Testing in Real World Conditions Outside AI Regulatory Sandboxes
- Article 62: Measures for Providers and Deployers, in Particular SMEs, including Start-Ups
- Article 63: Derogations for Specific Operators
Chapter VII: Governance
Chapter IX: Post-Market Monitoring, Information Sharing and Market Surveillance
- Section 1: Post-Market Monitoring
- Section 2: Sharing of Information on Serious Incidents
- Section 3: Enforcement
- Article 74: Market Surveillance and Control of AI Systems in the Union Market
- Article 75: Mutual Assistance, Market Surveillance and Control of General-Purpose AI Systems
- Article 76: Supervision of Testing in Real World Conditions by Market Surveillance Authorities
- Article 77: Powers of Authorities Protecting Fundamental Rights
- Article 78: Confidentiality
- Article 80: Procedure for Dealing with AI Systems Classified by the Provider as Non-High-Risk in Application of Annex III
- Article 81: Union Safeguard Procedure
- Article 82: Compliant AI Systems which Present a Risk
- Article 82a
- Article 83: Formal Non-Compliance
- Article 84: Union AI Testing Support Structures
- Article 79: Procedure at National Level for Dealing with AI Systems Presenting a Risk
- Section 4: Remedies
- Section 5: Supervision, Investigation, Enforcement and Monitoring in Respect of Providers of General-Purpose AI Models
- Article 88: Enforcement of the Obligations of Providers of General-Purpose AI Models
- Article 89: Monitoring Actions
- Article 90: Alerts of Systemic Risks by the Scientific Panel
- Article 91: Power to Request Documentation and Information
- Article 92: Power to Conduct Evaluations
- Article 93: Power to Request Measures
- Article 94: Procedural Rights of Economic Operators of the General-Purpose AI Model
Chapter XIII: Final Provisions
- Article 102: Amendment to Regulation (EC) No 300/2008
- Article 103: Amendment to Regulation (EU) No 167/2013
- Article 104: Amendment to Regulation (EU) No 168/2013
- Article 105: Amendment to Directive 2014/90/EU
- Article 106: Amendment to Directive (EU) 2016/797
- Article 107: Amendment to Regulation (EU) 2018/858
- Article 108: Amendment to Regulation (EU) 2018/1139
- Article 109: Amendment to Regulation (EU) 2019/2144
- Article 110: Amendment to Directive (EU) 2020/1828
- Article 111: AI Systems Already Placed on the Market or Put into Service and General-Purpose AI Models Already Placed on the Marked
- Article 112: Evaluation and Review
- Article 113: Entry into Force and Application